UK and US Decline to Sign International AI Declaration at Paris Summit
At a recent global summit in Paris, the UK and US chose not to sign an international agreement on artificial intelligence (AI), despite dozens of other countries, including France, China, and India, pledging to adopt an "open", "inclusive", and "ethical" approach to AI development.
![British and American flags waving against a clear blue sky, symbolizing unity or diplomacy. Bright red, white, and blue colors dominate.](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d80bd7_b8b7ab517dc945c2a3448d0b3e554659~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_551,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/d80bd7_b8b7ab517dc945c2a3448d0b3e554659~mv2.jpg)
The UK government cited concerns about national security and "global governance" as reasons for not adding its name to the agreement. Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance expressed worries that excessive regulation of AI could hinder the industry's growth potential.
Vance emphasised the importance of prioritising "pro-growth AI policies" over safety measures, a stance that appeared to clash with French President Emmanuel Macron's call for more stringent regulations to advance AI technology responsibly.
The UK, previously a proponent of AI safety, faced criticism for its decision not to sign the agreement. Andrew Dudfield, head of AI at Full Fact, warned that the UK's credibility as a leader in safe and ethical AI innovation could be compromised.
However, UKAI, a trade body representing AI businesses across the UK, supported the government's choice, highlighting the need to balance environmental responsibility with the industry's energy demands.
The international AI agreement, signed by 60 countries, aims to bridge digital divides, promote AI accessibility, ensure transparent and secure development, and address the technology's energy consumption. It also underscores the importance of making AI sustainable for both people and the planet.
Despite agreeing with much of the declaration, the UK government felt that it lacked practical clarity on global governance and did not adequately address national security concerns related to AI.
The summit discussions revolved around the societal, environmental, and governance impacts of AI development, with a focus on capturing its economic benefits while mitigating risks. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen stressed the need for action and highlighted Europe's approach to AI, which prioritises innovation, collaboration, and open-source technology.
As the UK and EU navigate growing trade tensions with the US, the UK's decision not to retaliate against US tariffs on steel and aluminium imports reflects its strategy to maintain relations with the Trump administration while strengthening ties with the EU.
UK and US decline to sign international AI agreement at Paris summit.
UK cites national security and governance concerns for non-participation.
US Vice President emphasises pro-growth AI policies over stringent regulations.
Source: BBC